My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/17/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
2/17/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:17 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:44:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/17/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
He wished to emphasize that they still support the staff's <br />recommendations for all the reasons already in the records of the <br />various hearings and believe a density;of 6, which actually <br />equates to something much less than that, should be maintained. <br />While the Winter Beach League has many participants who are <br />owners of small lots, Mr. Herzog wanted the Board to consider <br />that in the 250 acre area about 900 of the property owners have <br />submitted letters in support of having the density level <br />maintained at 6. <br />Planner Shearer believed Mr. Herzog is referring to the 216 <br />acres that was deleted, and Commissioner Eggert noted that really <br />isn't under consideration today. She asked if Mr. Herzog was <br />opposing the change to LD -1 on the subject 250 acres. <br />Mr. Herzog stated they have no opposition to the change for <br />the area outlined on the map; they are not concerned about the <br />area west of Lateral G. <br />James Taylor, 69th St., Winter Beach, spoke for residents of <br />the area who cannot be here today. He noted that the plan being <br />discussed is not the one originally drawn up for the Winter Beach <br />area. He stressed that there are too many unanswered questions <br />concerning the fate of their community, and the corridor as <br />originally presented is the major question. Mr. Taylor believed <br />the residents' investments represent a far greater investment and <br />potential for loss should the complexion of the neighborhood <br />change radically, and he again asked the Commission to act on the <br />proposal as originally developed. <br />Mrs. Ida Kirk informed the Board that they do not want the <br />proposal as it is today, which is LD -1 just for their property, <br />and if it comes to voting it down, so be it. They want the LD -1 <br />for all the acreage originally proposed. <br />It was determined no one else wished to be heard, and the <br />Chairman declared the public hearing closed. <br />53 M <br />FEB 17 981 �oo� Gg c� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.