2/24/1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The Board reviewed the following memo dated 2/13187: TO: The Honorable Members ofDATE: February 13, 1987 FILE: the Board of County Commissioners DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: Robert M. Keat L ng, ICP SUBJECT: H. H. , FLOYD SUBDIVISION Planning & Develop ent Director REGULATION WAIVER FROM: Stan Boling ./o�- 6, REFERENCES: HH Floyd Chief, Current Development STAN3 It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular meeting of February 24, 1987. BACKGROUND AND CONDITIONS: Mr. Fred Mensing, on behalf of property owner- H. H. Floyd, is requesting a' waiver from section 6(a)(3) of the subdivision ordinance. Such a waiver would allow an existing parcel (the subject property) to be split into two parcels, both of which would lack the minimum road frontage 'required in the subdivision and zoning ordinances. The subject property ""is a combination of a 5 acre lot (Lot 14, A.A. Berry Subdivision) and a parcel consisting of 35' wide strips that connect Lot 14 to Lot 18. and to- 130th Street (see attachment #3). This combination was first created in 1979. In accordance with section 6(a)(3) of the subdivision ordinance and in accordance with section 29(b) of the zoning code which was in effect in 1979, lots resulting from a split of the subject property would have to have at least 701 of frontage on a dedicated road right-of-way. Since the only dedicated road rights-of-way in the vicinity are Dale Street and 130th Street, the subject property cannot be split in such a way so as to conform with the current frontage requirements. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS: The existing subject parcel is -presently "buildable" for one dwelling unit because Lot 14 is "grandfathered -in" as an old lot of record. It is the proposed parcel split that would create two non -conforming parcels lacking the required road frontage. Alternatives exist whereby the parcel can be developed and conform with existing regulations. The parcel can be: 1) developed for one dwelling unit; 2) platted and site -planned as a mobile home park as long as a road right-of-way, at least 50' wide, could be provided to the site; or 3) combined with adjacent property so as to render a split creating two parcels, each having a minimum of 70' of dedicated road frontage. Section 11 of the subdivision ordinance sets forth four criteria which must be met before a subdivision waiver may be granted. Three of these criteria are not met by the request. The criteria are as follows: 58 BOOK �� f'i.GE �� FEB24 1987