My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/3/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
3/3/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:17 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:45:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/03/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
more confidence that there has been no slip-up, and somehow this <br />stamp doesn't make her feel the.county is protected in the way <br />she had 'assumed it was protected. <br />Administrator Balczun advised that staff is currently <br />developing a new method for contract administration and contract <br />execution. The Administrator stated that generally when he <br />signs, he is indicating that the contract document is in the best <br />interests of the county. <br />Commissioner Bird believed if any of the staff feels <br />something is not in the best interests of the county, the time to <br />indicate that is when we are discussing it at the meeting. <br />In the ensuing discussion regarding how complex things have <br />become, Chairman Scurlock discussed the County structure, noting <br />that we have only three people who work directly for the Board - <br />the County Attorney, the Administrator, and Administrative Aide <br />Liz Forlani; everyone else works directly under the <br />Administrator. <br />Attorney Vitunac stated that is why we should have at least <br />two names on each document - the County Attorney and County <br />Administrator - and then you know that everything under each of <br />them has been covered. He continued that the stamp the attorney <br />signs actually does not mean just that the document is in the <br />proper form, but that the document does what the Board wanted it <br />to do, and it is legal. <br />Commissioner Eggert noted that she just wasn't sure what the <br />stamp meant and wanted to express her feeling that she is <br />counting a lot on the Attorney's office, especially since we have <br />adopted the policy that if we move to approve a certain thing, <br />included in that approval is the ability for the Chairman to sign <br />the document. <br />Commissioner Bowman suggested the Attorney's stamp could say <br />"form, substance, and legal sufficiency," and Administrator <br />Balczun suggested the word "intent." <br />3 <br />MAS 31987 BOOK 6 7 PF§I) -L 4 5 58 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.