My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/3/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
3/3/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:17 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:45:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/03/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�DAAR 1987 <br />BOOK 6 �7 F.�G`r_4 9 3 <br />Discussion ensued about the amount of property this would <br />amount to, and Chief Planner Shearer stated it would be easily <br />240 acres, depending if you included the property all the way <br />over to 1-95 or if you stopped at 82nd Ave. <br />Discussion continued re the amount to add, and Commissioner <br />Wheeler pointed out that Aerodrome Subdivision is not too far <br />away, and also south of 5th Street is being developed. <br />Chairman Scurlock further noted that both water and <br />wastewater are very much available to this area. <br />Commissioner Bird believed another option would be to <br />compromise to some degree and just take the northern line to the <br />end of the 40 acre blocks, including those blocks in their <br />entirety instead of cutting them in half, and not go all the way <br />to 5th St. SW where we would start encroaching on Aerodrome <br />Subdivision. <br />The Chairman agreed that we need some buffer between the <br />node and Aerodrome Subdivision, which is an expanding residential <br />development. <br />Commissioner Bird asked how Attorney Sutherland felt about <br />including the 40 acre blocks as suggested, and Attorney <br />Sutherland believed that would make a lot more sense. He again <br />emphasized that if residential development is not blocked out <br />now, we will never be able to use this area as an industrial site <br />in the future, and it is always possible to downzone later on. <br />Discussion continued i.n regard to possibly including the 60 <br />acres of each blocked area as you move across up to Rebel Road <br />which would be 240 acres additional. <br />Attorney O'Haire pointed out that there is an enormous <br />borrow pit which was dug in connection with the construction of <br />1-95 that takes up a good part of a 40 acre tract and is a <br />natural buffer to the residential subdivision on the north. He <br />also pointed out that Aerodrome Subdivision is unusual in.that it <br />has airplane traffic, and this would limit the residential <br />desirability of that piece of property. It was noted that the <br />38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.