My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/14/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
4/14/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:18 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:30:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/14/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APP 14 1937 <br />BOOK 6 8 f',�Gr 58 <br />5. An objective of the Plan is to "Maintain level -of -service <br />C, or better, on all major thoroughfares in the County."9 <br />Comment: Although the proposed amendment would leave <br />the adjacent thoroughfares at level -of -service C on an <br />annual basis, and at level -of -service D in peak season, <br />those are "minimum standards" under the Plan.10 It would <br />seem more desirable to not amend the plan, thereby aiding <br />in meeting Plan objectives, rather than amending the Plan, <br />and having road service drop to a minimum standard. <br />6. Plan performance standards for medium density residential <br />locations say that such uses "shall be located... where <br />governmental services can be provided in a cost effective <br />manner."11 Plan design performance standards include <br />"buffering living units.. -.from commercial uses ... utility <br />plants and principal streets near the site."12 <br />Comment: This parcel, as planned for medium density <br />residential, is proximate to public power, wastewater <br />treatment, major roads, employment and service centers. <br />It could be served very efficiently by government, were <br />it to develop residentially as planned. The Plan -design <br />performance standards mandate buffering. This could be <br />accomplished by berming, landscaping, physical barriers <br />or some combination of all three. The effectiveness of <br />this technique is apparent to anyone driving north on <br />A -1-A through Johns Island, a developed area that'�appears <br />undeveloped from the road. <br />7. The Plan's strategies for commercial development mandate <br />"Future sites shall locate in specified nodal areas."13 <br />The pperformance standards for retail and service commercial <br />uses14 state that "Traffic generated should not pass thru <br />residential neighborhoods" and "traffic ingress and egress <br />should not disrupt through traffic." <br />Comment: The parcel proposed for Plan amendment is not <br />within a specified node. Because the site is adjacent <br />to the Vero Beach City limits, consideration should be <br />given to the commercial areas nearby in the City before <br />a new commercial node is created. Hundreds of acres of <br />vacant commercial sites already exist within nodes. <br />If the performance standard of not having commercial traffic <br />pass through residential neighborhoods is to be accomplished <br />this parcel's access would have to be restricted to 17th <br />Street. The other performance standard of not disrupting <br />through traffic on 17th Street can be accomplished through <br />acceleration and deceleration lanes mixing site and 17th <br />Street traffic. However, if traffic accelerating west onto <br />17th Street wanted to return east to the barrier island, <br />there is a great likelihood that traffic would loop through <br />residential streets rather than driving several extra miles <br />around the major street system. <br />8. The Plan's special policy regulating nodal areas #4 states <br />"Commercial centers within all nodes shall have 4.5 square <br />feet of land area to everone (1) square foot of building <br />space whenever possible."y 5 <br />-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.