My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/26/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
5/26/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:18 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:36:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/26/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The clearing observed was in association with 23 survey tran- <br />sects, running north -south on the subject property. The <br />transects range in width from 14 to 43 feet (averaging 15 to 17 <br />feet in width), and are estimated to range from 600 to 1,700 <br />feet in length. <br />The property is owned by Larue Equities LTD. CO., represented <br />by Mr. Robert Mooney, and was cleared by Guettler &iSons, Inc. <br />of Fort Pierce. <br />The clearing of the survey lines was performed on the property <br />to provide topographic data for submittal to the. County as <br />support information to the Sand Ridge Country Club Estates <br />preliminary plat application, submitted prior to the recent <br />rezoning of the property. <br />ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS: <br />Section 231-6(a) & (b), Tree Protection, of the Code of Laws <br />and Ordinances of Indian River County, Florida prohibits the <br />performance of.any tree removal, landclearing o grubbing <br />unless tree removal and landclearing permits have:first been <br />issued by the County. The ordinance further species that a <br />violation shall be -punishable upon conviction by a fine not to <br />exceed five hundred dollars ($500) per tree and landclealring <br />activity or by imprisonment in the County jail for up to sixty <br />(60) days, or both. <br />Section 231-7(a) of the Tree Protection Ordinance exempts from <br />permitting the clearing of a survey path not to exceed four (4) <br />feet in width for the preparation of subdivision plats, or the - <br />clearing of a path not to exceed ten (10) feet in width for the <br />°purpose of soil bore testing. In either case, the ordinance <br />specifies that no protected vegetation is to be clealred as part <br />of the exemption. <br />The clearing that occurred does not satisfy exemption criteria, <br />in that path width maximums have been substantially exceeded, <br />and protected trees have been removed. <br />Based on the illegal landclearing and number of protected trees <br />removed, the maximum fine in this case is $2,000.00.1 The owner <br />has submitted a check to staff to obtain an after -the -fact <br />landclearing permit, which is being held until the Commission <br />addresses the matter. <br />X_ <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners consider <br />obtaining a.voluntary payment of $2,000 dollars, in addition to <br />the requirement of after -the -fact permits. In the event that <br />any said agreement is not forth -coming, staff recommends that y <br />the Board of County Commissioners grant staff the authorization <br />to pursue available remedies in County Court. <br />Planner Roland DeBiois explained that the path cleared for <br />survey transects averages between 15-79 ft. in width, but goes to <br />43 ft. at some points where equipment turned around. He pointed <br />out that Section 231-7A of the Tree Protection Ordinance provides <br />for 4 -ft. -wide paths for the preparation of subdivision plats and <br />31 BOOK <br />NAY 2 r: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.