Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Schaffer strongly opposed the proposed,pavingl <br />Street as he felt the drainage problem could be solved) <br />going to the expense of paving that street. <br />Chairman Scurlock reiterated that one of the basi <br />staff is recommending the paving of these streets is t� <br />consolidate the grading route in that area, which invo+ <br />getting a grader across U.S. #1. <br />Mr. Schaffer believed that the drainage problem a <br />of the street was caused when the grader plugged two d <br />They just want the drainage problem to be solved; they, <br />g - <br />of 110th <br />without _ <br />reasons <br />ves <br />the end <br />-ains. <br />do not <br />want the street paved. He believed that the drainage problem <br />would go away if the County put the street back the war it was <br />and stopped the grading, because they never had a drainage <br />problem before the County started grading that street. <br />County Engineer Brescia explained that drainage i a very <br />critical part of the street paving process. <br />Joe Rothgery, 6655 Paradise Lane (110th Street) stated he <br />was very happy to hear that the County is planning to pave 110th <br />Street. <br />Glenn Hall of 110th Place explained that the marl' -based road <br />gets ruts in it every time it rains, and he wished to see it <br />paved. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowman, the Board approved staf <br />recommendation for the paving of 110th Stree <br />110th Place, east of U.S. #1, at an interest <br />12%. <br />32nd Terrace (Suburban Acres Subdivision) <br />Ms. Terry explained that with the Board's approv <br />Terrace will be scheduled for resurfacing improvement <br />18 <br />JUN 9 197 <br />BOOK <br />f <br />and <br />rate of <br />32nd <br />to bring <br />