Laserfiche WebLink
JUN: 9 1987 <br />BOOK 6 8 [Y�'UE 519 <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends, in accordance with Section 13-20(c) of the <br />Nuisance Ordinance, that the Board adopt a resolution declaring <br />a weed nuisance on the subject property, giving the owner ten <br />(10) days to correct the nuisance. <br />In the event that the weed nuisance is not abated within ten <br />(10) days, staff recommends that the Board authorize County <br />staff to abate the nuisance and assess such cost against the <br />property owner. <br />Chairman Scurlock noted that there is no requirement of a <br />public notice in an appeal of a Public Nuisance Ordinance <br />violation. <br />Penelope Hessen, 2105 Windward Way, emphasized that this <br />particular lot was on the tax rolls under a tax certificate <br />between 1978 and 1982. In 1982 she purchased it as a tax deed, <br />and until 1984 no one ever bothered her about the condition of <br />the lot. About that time she noticed that someone in the <br />neighborhood had been parking a truck on the lot, and she put a <br />stop to that because she did not want the lot to become a parking <br />lot. She believed the truck belonged to the Mithiaco's, who made <br />the complaint to the Code Enforcement Board. A while later, a <br />huge load of sand was delivered and dumped on the lot, apparently <br />to be used by the Mithiaco's in landscaping their lot. Mrs. <br />Hessen wished to read a letter from someone in the neighborhood <br />that was put in her mailbox, but Chairman Scurlock pointed out <br />that the main issue today is not to settle an neighborhood <br />dispute, but to determine whether Mrs. Hessen is in violation of <br />the Public Nuisance Ordinance in that her lot has grasses and <br />weeds growing to heights exceeding 18". <br />Mrs. Hessen argued that the high grass is to the back of the <br />lot, and did not feel she should be held responsible for removing <br />the grass clippings and branches that have been dumped in the <br />front of the lot. She felt that she should not have to police <br />her property to keep people from dumping there. <br />Chairman Scurlock explained that the new ordinance states <br />that a lot, which"Js next to a developed lot in a platted <br />31 <br />