My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/9/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
6/9/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:18 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:38:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/09/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUN: 9 1987 <br />BOOK 6 8 [Y�'UE 519 <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends, in accordance with Section 13-20(c) of the <br />Nuisance Ordinance, that the Board adopt a resolution declaring <br />a weed nuisance on the subject property, giving the owner ten <br />(10) days to correct the nuisance. <br />In the event that the weed nuisance is not abated within ten <br />(10) days, staff recommends that the Board authorize County <br />staff to abate the nuisance and assess such cost against the <br />property owner. <br />Chairman Scurlock noted that there is no requirement of a <br />public notice in an appeal of a Public Nuisance Ordinance <br />violation. <br />Penelope Hessen, 2105 Windward Way, emphasized that this <br />particular lot was on the tax rolls under a tax certificate <br />between 1978 and 1982. In 1982 she purchased it as a tax deed, <br />and until 1984 no one ever bothered her about the condition of <br />the lot. About that time she noticed that someone in the <br />neighborhood had been parking a truck on the lot, and she put a <br />stop to that because she did not want the lot to become a parking <br />lot. She believed the truck belonged to the Mithiaco's, who made <br />the complaint to the Code Enforcement Board. A while later, a <br />huge load of sand was delivered and dumped on the lot, apparently <br />to be used by the Mithiaco's in landscaping their lot. Mrs. <br />Hessen wished to read a letter from someone in the neighborhood <br />that was put in her mailbox, but Chairman Scurlock pointed out <br />that the main issue today is not to settle an neighborhood <br />dispute, but to determine whether Mrs. Hessen is in violation of <br />the Public Nuisance Ordinance in that her lot has grasses and <br />weeds growing to heights exceeding 18". <br />Mrs. Hessen argued that the high grass is to the back of the <br />lot, and did not feel she should be held responsible for removing <br />the grass clippings and branches that have been dumped in the <br />front of the lot. She felt that she should not have to police <br />her property to keep people from dumping there. <br />Chairman Scurlock explained that the new ordinance states <br />that a lot, which"Js next to a developed lot in a platted <br />31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.