Laserfiche WebLink
Fr­ <br />jum 16197 <br />BOOK 68 ou, 56S <br />Commissioner Bird discussed having another Motion in regard <br />to changing the PRO ordinance as he felt we may very well run <br />into other situations where we can't stick to the five acres. He <br />was particularly concerned about the property on the corner which <br />he did not feel is residentially suited and preferably should be <br />either PRO or commercial. <br />Director Keating agreed that it definitely would be possible <br />to change the minimum district requirements in PRO; that is a <br />policy decision, but staff would recommend against it because of <br />the problems that could arise. <br />Commissioner Eggert proposed a Motion to authorize staff to <br />look at the PRO District again, but Commissioner Wheeler noted <br />that he was happy with the five acre requirement. If you start <br />dropping the acreage down, then where do you stop. You can't <br />continue to rewrite the ordinance for every situation. <br />In further discussion, it was agreed a Motion was not <br />necessary, and it could be considered just direction to staff to <br />look further at the PRO District and come up with several <br />alternatives. <br />PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PAVING OF 5 ROADS <br />The hour of 9:05 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy <br />Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication <br />attached, to -wit: <br />