Laserfiche WebLink
fi- <br />not be glad to be included, but she is afraid we send a message <br />when we get involved. <br />Commissioner Bowman noted that as an individual, she wanted _ <br />to stay out of it; she has seen the height limitations in the <br />city move up and down like a yo-yo. <br />Commissioner Bird felt Commissioner Eggert's position is <br />pretty much the same as our position on this two years ago, and <br />Chairman Scurlock agreed but pointed out that the law has changed <br />since then. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Wheeler, not to participate in terms of <br />the county park and stay moot on the question of <br />annexation. <br />Commissioner Wheeler wished to know if we stay out and it <br />goes to referendum and passes, how we then go about including our <br />91 acres. <br />County Attorney Vitunac noted that if the City gets the 51% <br />of the acreage without the county's signature, then the question <br />is do we want to be included in the map of the property that is <br />going to be annexed; we can decide at that time whether we wish <br />to be included in that map. <br />Commissioner Wheeler agreed this should be left up to the <br />people in the area, especially since the county has such a small <br />percentage of the acreage. <br />Commissioner Bird felt if, for instance, he owned 10 acres <br />and did not want to be included, but the vote goes for annexa- <br />tion, he would be included anyway, and asked why the County would <br />be any different. <br />County Attorney Vitunac believed if the County made a strong <br />pitch to stay out, the City probably would just drop us out <br />because they don't need us for contiguousness under the new law. <br />They do need the private property owners for that purpose. <br />41 BOOK �:� tA�E 6P� <br />L:JUN 2 31987 <br />