Laserfiche WebLink
r JUL 14 1987 <br />BGGK. r:'�c �: <br />county. He felt he should point out that it is not an <br />opportunity for them'to question the Board other than as to how <br />our policies affect their franchise. <br />Commissioner Bird felt this will be a good opportunity to <br />ask the Press to clarify better the relationship between Bent <br />Pine Utility, the Bent Pine residential community, and the Bent <br />Pine Country Club, because those living there feel they are being <br />impacted negatively by this and we need to clarify that is an <br />entirely separate community. <br />Franchise Manager Abernethy made the following presentation: <br />DATE: <br />TO: <br />THRU: <br />FROM: <br />SUBJECT: <br />BACKGROUND <br />JUNE 29, 1987 <br />BOARD OF COUNTY COMNIISS <br />TERRANCE G. PINTO <br />DIRECTOR OF UTILI <br />LISA M. ABERNETHY] <br />FRANCHISE MANAGER <br />EXTENSION OF FRANCHISE FOR BENT PINE UTILITY AND <br />NONCOMPLIANCE OF FRANCHISE 79-111 <br />On March 28, 1980, Indian River County granted a water and wastewater <br />franchise to the Bent Pine Utility Company. The franchise, <br />Resolution 79-111, carried stipulations regarding County purchase of <br />the facilities within seven (7) years (March 28, 1987). The County <br />elected option 3 of Section XIV, page 11, which states, "...and <br />County shall grant to the Corporation an appropriate franchise." <br />ANALYSIS <br />Correspondence between the County and Bent Pine Utility have not been <br />successful in resolving "an appropriate franchise". Bent Pine <br />Utility has stated, see Exhibit "A", that they, "have no legal <br />obligation nor other business reason to execute another franchise." <br />Further, Resolution 79-111 does not contain the option for the <br />agreement to be considered a permanent contract. <br />During the seven years that Bent Pine Utility was under the <br />regulation of the County and Resolution 79-111, a number of <br />discrepancies were incurred and never resolved. These discrepancies <br />are listed below along with the corresponding exhibit. <br />1. EXHIBIT "B". Section VI, pg 4 and 5, paragraph 2, states <br />that, "...whereupon the County will issue a permit accepting the <br />water and sewerage systems, and further, that the said water and <br />sewerage systems and all easements, (excepting only the water and <br />sewer plants, and wells without appurtenances, and the real property <br />upon which it is situated), shall be conveyed, along with "as -built" <br />plans, to the County at the time of acceptance by a customary means <br />of conveyance. Corporation shall, in addition, grant necessary <br />easements to County without charge to connect the water and/or <br />sewerage systems to County's Master Water and/or Sewerage Systems and <br />such easements as are necessary to provide access to the sewer <br />systems and water systems." To date the Utility has not conveyed to <br />the County water and sewer easements and the Utility has not provided <br />as -built drawings. <br />42 <br />