My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/14/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
7/14/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2020 2:29:24 PM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:42:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/14/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,JUL 1,&,,. 198 goo r 4 r <br />n MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Wodtke, to approve the proposed letter <br />notifying Bent Pine Utility Company that the County <br />does not intend to pursue its purchase option and <br />asking that they enter -into a new franchise agreement. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked about Impact fees, and Assistant <br />Utilities Director Barton advised that Bent Pine collects them <br />from the people developing the lots. However, those fees do not <br />come to the county, and that -is why the franchise is being <br />brought up to date. <br />The Chairman stated he had questions about a "new" franchise <br />not being an "appropriate" franchise. He felt a "new" franchise <br />would mean the one we are offering to everyone wishing to do <br />business in the county. <br />In the ensuing discussion, Director Pinto noted that the <br />Board must keep in mind that at the conclusion of this meeting, <br />they do not have to make a decision, but just take all the <br />information presented at the public hearing and then establish <br />what their order is going to be. He noted that the Board has the <br />ability within that order to say whatever they think is best for <br />the franchise area, and that very well may be that the franchise <br />is extended or granted only after the utility has complied. All <br />of those things come from the authority of the regulator, which <br />the Board is. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked if we don't want to send a message <br />today that we are saying they are in non-compliance and that they <br />have a certain amount of time to come into compliance, and <br />Director Pinto stated that the Board has the ability to place <br />them on notice that they are now not in compliance. <br />v <br />THE CHAIRMAN <br />CALLED <br />FOR THE <br />QUESTION. <br />uuG <br />6 1986 <br />it was voted <br />on and <br />carried <br />unanimously.*' <br />800Y 65 <br />tt;.345 <br />The Chairman stated he had questions about a "new" franchise <br />not being an "appropriate" franchise. He felt a "new" franchise <br />would mean the one we are offering to everyone wishing to do <br />business in the county. <br />In the ensuing discussion, Director Pinto noted that the <br />Board must keep in mind that at the conclusion of this meeting, <br />they do not have to make a decision, but just take all the <br />information presented at the public hearing and then establish <br />what their order is going to be. He noted that the Board has the <br />ability within that order to say whatever they think is best for <br />the franchise area, and that very well may be that the franchise <br />is extended or granted only after the utility has complied. All <br />of those things come from the authority of the regulator, which <br />the Board is. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked if we don't want to send a message <br />today that we are saying they are in non-compliance and that they <br />have a certain amount of time to come into compliance, and <br />Director Pinto stated that the Board has the ability to place <br />them on notice that they are now not in compliance. <br />v <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.