7/21/1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

since it would be used by all types of vehicles and pedestrians - cars, trucks, golf carts, bicycles, joggers, etc. Mrs. Eubanks pointed out that since Vista Gardens pays 75% of the maintenance of that easement, they have a definite vested interest. Mrs. Eubanks understood there is a 10 -day appeal period after site plan approval is given. Chairman Scurlock advised that if they still objected to the site plan at the time of approval, they have 10 days in which to appeal it to the Board of County Commissioners, and a public hearing would be scheduled. He emphasized that only at that time coui.d the Commissioners become involved in any site plan modi- fications, such as limiting the egress or ingress to the site. He felt that the people of Vista Gardens will find that the Board will do everything possible to mitigate the impact of the proposed development. Claude Perosa, member of the board of directors of the property owners association, thanked the Planning Department for informing them that a site plan had been submitted. He felt that if the site plan that was submitted yesterday is the same as the one presented by the developer during a meeting with the residents some months ago, they will have no other recourse than to appeal it if it is approved, because there are 4 entrances on U.S. #1 and 2 on Indian River Boulevard. He felt that the site plan is more severe than what was promised by the developer. Director Keating advised that the earliest they could get the site plan to the P & Z would be August 27th; however, he believed it probably would be the first week of September. Harold Putnam asked everyone to stand who was in opposition to the proposed commercial development. Ninety-nine percent of those in attendance stood up. Joan Frisk commented that when she went to visit her daughter in Texas who lives in a similar situation, she could not get out onto the highway from the entrance. 39 'JUL BOOK 8 E'a',t SSI L