Laserfiche WebLink
Phase II- County staff would take the approved low bid amount and develop <br />an assessment roll for the project. A public hearing would be <br />held and the regular petition paving process would take place. <br />Phase III -If the Board of County Cam issioners approved the project, the <br />County would, upon completion, fund 62$% of the cost from the <br />petition paving fund and assess the other benefited owners the <br />remaining 37}x. The actual contract for the paving would be <br />between the County and the Contractor. Proper insurance and a <br />Performance bond would be required. The Developer would fund his <br />37}% prior to construction. <br />Staff does not recommend that the Developer contract with a private company <br />and bill the County for the 62J% not funded by the Developer. <br />Staff reccmmends the above Three Phase Program be approved. Funding to be <br />addressed at the time of Public Hearing. <br />Commissioner Eggert realized they wish to expedite and felt <br />it is great to go outside to get this work done since we can't <br />take care of everything, but had a problem with the developer <br />doing the contracting when we want control. <br />Chairman Scurlock agreed that he also could understand the <br />need to expedite, but brought up the example of Apple Way, where <br />years ago the residents got the work done quickly; however, 4 or <br />5 years later, the road crumbled because it wasn't properly <br />inspected and wasn't done to county specs, and then the residents <br />were angry and looking for someone to blame. He felt by not <br />having control of these improvements, we let ourselves in for <br />future problems. <br />Administrator Balczun advised that the thrust of the issue <br />is to have the developer pay the cost of the engineering to <br />expedite the project, and he wished to know if the Board would <br />have a problem with the proposal <br />have'a developer's agreement. <br />if it were reoriented for us to <br />Chairman Scurlock believed this should be handled similar to <br />the approach we took on Item C on the Consent Agenda where the <br />contract will be with us; this will facilitate getting the work <br />done, but we will have control. <br />29 BOOK f'rF:ut 4Qu <br />