Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK 69 PAGE 221 <br />PROPOSED SAND RIDGE AQUIFER PROTECTION ORDINANCE <br />Commissioner Bowman referred to the following staff memo: <br />TO: Commissioner Maggy BowmarDLATE: August 24, 1987 F <br />PROPOSED SANDRIDGE <br />SUBJECT: AQUIFER PROTECTION <br />ORDINANCE <br />Robert M. Keating, AICP/�loK SANDRIDGE ORD. <br />FROM: Director, community -REFERENCES: IBMIRD <br />Development Division <br />As you are aware, the Planning and Zoning Commission, at its <br />meeting of August 20, 1987, voted 4-3 against recommending <br />adoption of the proposed Sandridge Aquifer Protection Ordinance <br />to the Board of County Commissioners. <br />Since the proposed ordinance was denied by the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission, the ordinance will not be considered by the <br />Board of County Commissioners unless the action of denial by <br />the Planning Commission is appealed. At this time, due to a <br />lack of public support for the ordinance, I do not plan to <br />appeal the Planning and Zoning Commission action to the Board <br />of County Commissioners. <br />Since I know that you have an interest in this item, I wish to <br />inform you that, should you wish the ordinance to be considered <br />by the Board of.County Commissioners, you have the option of <br />raising the appeal issue to the Board at its next meeting as <br />one of your matters. Because of the short timeframe available <br />for appeals of ordinance denials, it would be necessary for the <br />Board to consider the matter soon. So if you decide to pursue <br />the matter, I would suggest that you schedule.it for discussion <br />under your matters at the next Board of County Commissioners <br />meeting. <br />If any questions arise regarding this matter, please do not <br />hesitate to contact me. <br />Commissioner Bowman expressed her desire that this matter <br />come before this body because our water resources need every <br />possible protection as is mandated in our Land Use Plan, and <br />there is no other jurisdiction that can afford this protection. <br />Commissioner Eggert inquired if the Planning Department is <br />going to appeal the decision of the Planning & Zoning Commission, <br />and Commissioner Bowman stated they are not because they felt <br />there was a lack of public support. She pointed out that this <br />originally came up on a night when the P&Z did not have a quorum <br />42 <br />