9/8/1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,The Board reviewed the following staff recommendation: TO: The Honorable Members DATE: August 18, 1987 FILE: of the Board of County Commissioners P1 FROM: ION HEAD CONCURRENCE: SUBJECT: eatµngI ng & DedelopmLnt Director PENN MOBIL PARTNERSHIP/ HATALA/STENGER REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPRE- HENSIVE PLAN AND REZONE 3 ACRES avid C. Nearing REFERENCES: taff Planner, Long -Range Planning It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal - consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular meeting of September 8, 1987. DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS Michael O'Haire, an agent for Penn Mobil Partnership, Ronald Hat la and Daryl Stenger, the owners, is requesting to amend the Comprehensive Plan by redesignating 3 acres located 200 feet east of J.S. 1 and south of 35th Street from MD -1, Medium -Density Residential 1 (up to 8 units/acre), to MXD, Mixed -Use District (up ito 6 units/acre), and to rezone this property from RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District, (up to 6 units/acre), to CG, 'General Commercial District. The owners would like to develop this property for retail businesses and mini -storage facilities. On March 12, 1987, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5 -to -0 to recommend approval of amending the Comprehensive Plan and rezoning the West 150 feet of the subject property. The Planning and Zoning Commission denied the request for the east 550 feet of the subject property because of the configuration of the subject property which is extremely deep east -west and narrow north -south. The applicants have appealed this decision. On April 14, 1987, the Board of County Commissioners voted 5-0 to transmit this request to the Department of Community Affiars. Ther motion also stated that they preferred that the entire depth of the property be designated as MXD, and that staff initiate a comprehensive plan amendment to establish a larger mixd use district along the corridor between the MED node and the North Relief Canal. The comment received from the,.department of Community Affairs and all other reveiwing agencies concurred with the request and found it o be consistent with their plans. :RNATIVES & ANALYSIS ' In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the appli- cation will be presented. The analysis will include a descrip- tion of the current and future land uses of the site and sur- rounding areas, potential impacts on the transportation and utility systems, and any significant adverse impacts on environ - men al quality. L 3 BOOK 6.9 'PAGE 274