My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/8/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
9/8/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:20 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:55:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/08/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Within a year after putchase the County plans to serve'the utility by <br />County owned and operated plants. Thus, certain of the utility's <br />failities, those relating to water supply, water treatment, and wastewater <br />tr�atment, have no value to the County. Subtracting the physical value of <br />these facilities from the total physical value equals $648,000, which is <br />the physcial value of the facilities that would remain in service after the <br />sale of the utility. This value divided by 200 connections equals about <br />$3,200. The $1,500 per connection for new customers is almost half the <br />physical value of the system on a per connection basis. From the above <br />discussion the connection charge appears reasonable and can be considered a <br />lire repayment fee. <br />New customers will also pay the County's impact fee for water and <br />wa tewater. This fee is for new capacity of plant, and does not relate to <br />th Bent Pine Utility Company existing infrastructure. <br />IMPACTS OF THE PURCHASE OR SALE ON UTILITY CUSTOMERS <br />The purchase of Bent Pine Utility Company by Indian River County benefits <br />both the County and the Bent Pine Community. The planned potential site of <br />the sub -regional pump station (master pumping site) is near the: present <br />BPUC wastewater facility requiring only that the station be connected to <br />existing lines. Regionalization of wastewater treatment eliminates <br />proliferation and provides for better effluent quality control. <br />Decommissioning of wells within the Bent Pine community provide the <br />opplortunity to dispose of effluent through irrigation on the golf courses, <br />approximately 0.5 mgd. <br />Lik wise, the present BPUC percolation ponds offer 0.07 mgd of effluent <br />disposal. These two effluent disposal sites can.be used to accomodate <br />effluent from other sources, other than the Bent Pine Community. In <br />addition, the land purchased from BPUC is a marketable asset. <br />Pip ng finished drinking water to the Bent Pine community conforms well <br />with. regional water service. <br />The Bent Pine community will be provided a higher quality of finished <br />water. Growth in water demands will be handled by IRC and not require the <br />expansion of the BPUC's existing facilities. <br />Upo purchase of Bent Pine Utility Company by the County, the rates and <br />cha ges of existing and future customers will be that which is levied to <br />all County water and wastewater customers. This charge will result in an <br />increase in rates to the Bent Pine customers. <br />Bas d on consumption statistics for the last seven months, a Bent Pine <br />res dential customer uses approximately 5,000 gallons per month on the <br />ave age. Under the existing rate this average customer pays $19.10 a month <br />for water and wastewater. Under the County rates the monthly charge would <br />be 34.78. <br />Thi increase is a negative impact, but offsetting this impact is the <br />fol owing: 1) the higher level of service provided by the County's water <br />and wastewater facilities; 2) the existing Bent Pine rates were set from <br />its 'inception in 1979 and probably do not reflect the actual higher cost of <br />service; 3) often when private utilities have the same level of service as <br />a public entity the rates levied by the private utility are higher due to <br />add d costs for taxes, etc., rate of return, and lack of economy of. scale. <br />Hen e, there is a likelihood that rates would go up dramatically should the <br />utility stay private. <br />47 BOOK 69 PACE 3018 <br />P 8 1987 <br />:I <br />u <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.