My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/15/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
9/15/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2018 9:43:48 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:57:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/15/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO: The Honorable Members of the DATE: September 8, 1987 FILE:-- <br />Board <br />IL.E:Board of County Commissioners <br />THROUGH: <br />Charles P. Balczun, <br />County Administrator <br />FROM - <br />'James W. Davis, P.E., <br />Public Works Directoi" <br />SUBJECT: Architect selection for Design <br />of the Fifth Courtroom <br />REFERENCES: <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />The Selection Committee interviewed three architectual firms on August 28, <br />1987 for the design of a Fifth Courtroom at the Courtroom Annex Building. - <br />Based upon the interviews held, the CanLi.ttee has ranked the firms in the <br />following order: <br />1) Architects Design Group, Inc. - Winter Park, Florida <br />2) W.R. Frizzell Architects - Palm Beach Gardens, F1. <br />3) John W. Calms, Vero Beach, Fl. <br />REC MMATION <br />It is recommended that staff begin Contract negotiations with Architects <br />Design Group, Inc. <br />There is no funding to be considered at this time. <br />Question arose about funding and whether monies are <br />budgeted. Director Davis believed he heard at budget sessions <br />that there are monies budgeted for the fifth courtroom, and the <br />Chairman asked that the Administrator check on the budgeted <br />amount. <br />Further discussion ensued regarding a price, and it was <br />noted that the Motion is to negotiate only. <br />Commissioner Bird was surprised that more local architect- <br />ural firms didn't submit proposals, but the Chairman believed our <br />history of renovations, especially in the Courthouse, has served <br />to dampen their enthusiasm. <br />27 <br />S EF 15 1987 konz� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.