Laserfiche WebLink
a <br />r <br />TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: September 11, 1987 FILE: <br />SUBJECT: DIXIE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION -_ <br />DRAINAGE & PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS _ <br />FROM: Charles P. Balczun, REFERENCES: <br />County Administrator —el <br />Attached you will find copies of correspondence with respect to your recent <br />action approving paving and certain drainage improvements in the Dixie Heights <br />Subdivision. That correspondence is as follows: <br />.: Stanley Steyer letter to Board of County Commissioners, dated July 21st <br />.: Charles Balczun letter to Stanley Steyer, dated July 29th <br />.: Memo to Sharon Brennan from Michelle Terry, dated July 31st <br />.: Stanley Steyer letter to Charles Balczun, dated August 7th <br />.: Memo to Charles Balczun from Jim Davis, dated August 10th <br />.: Charles Balczun letter to Stanley Steyer, dated August 14th <br />.: Stanley Steyer letter to Charles Balczun, dated August 28th <br />.: Charles Balczun letter to Stanley Steyer, dated September 11th <br />Most recently (August 28th) Mr. Steye& requests the Board of County Commissioners <br />take certain actions for the purpose of delaying this project or altering our <br />repayment plan for him. Mr. Steyer's proposals are set forth in Paragraph 5 <br />of the August 28th correspondence to me. <br />a I am placing this matter on the agenda for your meeting scheduled for September <br />22, 1987. <br />Administrator Balczun reviewed the correspondence he has had <br />with Mr. Steyer over the last few months, and presented Mr. <br />Steyer's alternatives in regard to the paving assessment. He <br />pointed out that if these alternatives were awarded to Mr. <br />Steyer, they would be alternatives never given to other people. <br />Administrator Balczun advised that Mr. Steyer owns abut 600 lots <br />in the county, of which approximately 200 are in the Dixie <br />Heights Subdivision area, and that Mr. Steyer feels he would be <br />financially strapped in paying for this paving assessment. He <br />pointed out that Mr. Steyer appears to own several properties, <br />all or portions of which are attractive to the County for <br />S EP 2 t )"0017 57 _ BOOK , 69 F* 541 <br />