My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/29/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
9/29/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:20 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:59:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/29/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� � r <br />This ordinance was advertised In the Vero Beach <br />Press Journal on the 24th day of September, 1987, for a <br />public hearing to be held on the 29th day of September, <br />1987, at which time it was moved for adoption by _ <br />Commissioner Eggert seconded by Commissioner <br />Bird and adopted by the following vote: <br />Chairman Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye <br />Vice Chairman Margaret C. Bowman Aye <br />Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye <br />Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye <br />Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler Aye - - <br />BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS - <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA <br />By <br />on curIoc -r. <br />Chairman 16/ <br />CIBA -GEIGY (CONTRACT FOR SALE 6 RESERVATION OF ROAD R/W) <br />County Attorney Vitunac explained that -Ciba-Geigy is <br />applying for a building permit, and as a part of our road R/W <br />acquisition, we require that they give us certain R/W for King's <br />Highway. With the new Supreme Court case, we would probably have <br />to pay for that, and they have agreed to reserve it. <br />the Chairman did not understand why we are entering into a <br />contract for sale. <br />Attorney Vitunac clarified that we are promising to buy the <br />land at this price if we decide we need it in the future for road <br />R/W, and they are promising to keep it unbuilt on so we don't <br />have to move any structures and pay a higher price in the future. <br />Commissioner Bird believed it is a good deal 'for us because <br />we are reserving it at today's land values. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked if we wouldn't normally accomplish <br />this by setting sufficient setbacks as we did on Route 60, as <br />opposed to having all these individual agreements. <br />Attorney Vitunac advised that the problem is that there is a <br />new court ruling which says the minute we deny them use of the <br />property within the setback that is a "taking" of the property. <br />SEP 2 0 1937 i7 BOOK I69 PACE'SO F <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.