10/14/1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

M W M Study Methodology Staff first identified the names and addresses of all property owners within the district boundaries, the type of dwelling unit (single-family, mobile home) on the site, and the date when the unit was first established on the site. A print-out of all occupational licenses issued in the County was then obtained in order to attempt to locate.businesses. These print-outs were then examined to determine what licensed businesses exist in this area. Staff also performed a visual survey of the district to attempt to locate the site of apparent businesses, those which may not have County occupational licenses. For each identified commercial use in the study area, staff determined the date when the residential use on the site commenced and the zoning district which was in place on the site when it was developed. This enabled staff to determine whether a home occupation, the nature of .which could be determined, was lawfully established as a permitted home occupation at that time. Study Results During the ROSE -4 ordinance amendment public hearing, it was stated that 43 home occupations existed in the Rose -4 District. However, a search of the occupational licenses revealed that only 4 licenses have been issued to addresses within the district boundaries. A total of six businesses were visually identified, two of which do not have occupational licenses. The types of businesses identified through the visual survey included a welding/ smelting shop, storage of vegetable crates and business trucks, storage of heavy equipment, automotive repair and sales, and blade sharpening and chainsaw repair. Those businesses identified by visual survey, excluding the saw sharpening and repair, were identified by the appearance of the property. The saw shop was identified by its sign. Further verification of these businesses was provided by Roseland residents through the filing of complaints with the Planning Department. Several existing businesses have been the subject of code enforcement complaints. These complaints have ranged from storage of possibly hazardous material to excessive noise. Not only do some of these businesses fail to meet the home occupation criteria of the ROSE -4 district, but because they were never approved they do not meet setback, screening, parking, sanitary, and other requirements. Grandfathering Issues As per the Board's directive, -the staff has investigated mechanisms wereby existing businesses could be legally recognized as grandfathered businesses. However, a major problem arises in the identification of businesses currently operating within the boundaries of the Rose -4 area. If as indicated at the public hearing, 43 businesses exist in the ROSE -4 area, the staff has been unable to identify them and therefore, could not grandfather them. Another issue is whether the County should grandfather a business which has been operating without an occupational license which is required by County law. Several other issues arise regarding grandfathering of existing businesses. The major issue is whether such businesses will be considered non -conformities if they do not comply with the ROSE -4 home occupation criteria. If such establishments are classified as non -conformities, they could not be enlarged or expanded without conforming to applicable regulations. Nor could they OCT JA 1987 BOOK 69 FAo 694