My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/27/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
10/27/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:21 AM
Creation date
6/4/2015 4:50:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/27/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17I-0 c°r 2 7 1987 <br />R• Q <br />uGK 69 FAr . I <br />U 825 <br />appropriate but that offices would be an acceptable use. He then <br />read from the Minutes of the meeting wherein former Chief Planner <br />Richard Shearer had indicated that the Planning 6 Zoning Commis- <br />sion felt the area was suitable for professional offices, but <br />since there was no vehicle to accomplish this, they ended up <br />voting to deny it. Board members indicated they hoped some <br />vehicle could be found whereby this could be done, and a PRO <br />District was subsequently adopted, but imposed an acreage <br />limitation that did not permit its application to this property. <br />Mr. Henderson advised that his client is committed to a PRO <br />zoning and would be more than happy to take that rather than <br />pursuing a Land Use change which is more radical but is the only <br />avenue available at this time. He asked the Board*to at least <br />keep the option alive by forwarding their request on to <br />Tallahassee and then consider it again in January, by which time <br />hopefully the PRO District can be amended so they can qualify. <br />Commissioner Eggert assumed, since this has come up so many <br />times, that if we do amend the PRO and this can qualify, this <br />could be brought forward as a county -initiated action. <br />Planning Director Keating agreed it could. He then reviewed <br />how the Board denied the PRO for this property but asked staff to <br />consider some alternatives in the PRO requirements. He informed <br />the Board that they did so and took their revision to the <br />Planning 6 Zoning Commission on October 8th. The P&Z was not <br />satisfied and requested that this matter go back to a workshop, <br />which will be held in two weeks. <br />Discussion continued as to whether we can still consider the <br />PRO for this property if we deny the transmittal today, and <br />Director Keating advised that if the PRO were revised so that it <br />made this property eligible, it would not be necessary to amend <br />the Comprehensive Plan to include this. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard. <br />Don Reams, 621 16th Place, advised that his property is <br />directly south of the subject property. He noted that this is <br />52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.