Laserfiche WebLink
Nov 10 1987 <br />BOOK 70 F��E ' f 5 <br />Additional Cost for Dual Designations: <br />500 intersections @ 1.5 blades per <br />intersection = <br />750 blades at $6.00 = $4,500.00 <br />Additional annual budget cost based on <br />5 yr. life of sign = $900.00 <br />(+) BENEFITS: In that the County's main function is to <br />serve the citizens in the interest of <br />health, safety, and welfare, the <br />requirement of road "number" designations <br />would be a benefit in helping to provide <br />quicker emergency service response. <br />Property Owners Association <br />(-) COSTS A private.development's property owners <br />association (P.O.A.) would be <br />responsible for replacing any road signs _ <br />in a subdivision, where signs either <br />deteriorate_ or are missing. Therefore, <br />any costs to a P.O.A. would occur <br />incrementally, when any particular sign <br />requires replacement. The expense of <br />replacing a sign would be a determination <br />of the P.O.A., providing that the <br />replacement sign meets minimum standards <br />set by the County Traffic <br />(COSTS) cont'd.: Engineer. If a road within a private <br />subdivision/development has a number <br />designation only, the proposed ordinance <br />would not result in any additional costs <br />to a P.O.A. than what is presently <br />required. <br />(+) BENEFITS: The requirement of road "number" <br />designations in addition to or in place <br />of road "name" designations would provide <br />field reference for emergency services <br />personnel, and therefore more efficient <br />emergency service response for residents <br />and members of a P.O.A. - <br />Developers <br />(-) COSTS: Road "number" designations requirements <br />would result in added expense to <br />developers who wish to plat subdivisions <br />with aesthetic road "names". However, <br />the developer would still have the option <br />of designating a road with a "number" <br />only, which would result in no additional <br />cost beyond what is already required. <br />(N/A) BENEFITS: The road designation requirements would <br />not result in any direct benefit to the <br />developer. <br />Individual Homeowners <br />(-) COSTS: Cost to the individual homeowner, based <br />on the requirement of road number <br />designations, would only affect those <br />homeowners who presently live on a road <br />with a "name" designation. The cost <br />would be the homeowners contribution to <br />28 <br />_ M <br />