My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/24/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
11/24/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:21 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:55:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/24/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r I <br />NOV 2 C, �M7 BOUT( 70 pgf,166 <br />REVISED PROPOSED ROAD ADDRESSING SYSTEM ORDINANCE <br />Staff Environmental Planner Roland DeBlois made the <br />following presentation, noting that the public hearing was <br />carried over from the November 10th meeting: <br />TO: The Honorable Members DATE: November 16, 1987 FELE: <br />of the Board of County <br />Commissioners <br />DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: REVISED PROPOSED ROAD <br />ADDRESSING SYSTEM <br />SUBJECT: ORDINANCE <br />Robert M. Kea inge--ICP <br />Community Development Director <br />THROUGH: Michael K. Miller, Chief <br />Environmental Planning f� <br />FROM Roland M. DeBlois` W> REFERENCES: Road Address. <br />Staff Environmental Planner DIS:IBMIRD - <br />It is requested that the data presented herein be given formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their <br />regular meeting of November 24, 1987. <br />DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS: <br />As directed by the Board of County Commissioners at a public <br />hearing on November 10, 1987, planning staff have revised the <br />proposed Road Addressing System Ordinance to reflect suggested <br />changes. <br />More specifically, it was the Board's determination that the <br />proposed ordinance be revised to require that all new roads carry <br />number designations (only), with a provision that road names may <br />be granted instead, but only upon appeal to the County (ie. <br />Planning and Zoning Commission) for approval. <br />The revised Road Addressing System ordinance is provided herein <br />for the Board's consideration of adoption. <br />ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS: <br />Section 18-58(d) on page 6 of the proposed ordinance, regarding <br />"named roads," has been revised in accordance with the Board's <br />recommendations at the previous public hearing. The revised <br />ordinance no longer calls for "dual" road designations (name and <br />number); new roads are required to have number designations <br />(only), in conformance with the surrounding grid pattern. Roads <br />with names existing prior to the effective date of the ordinance <br />would not be subject to this..;requirement (Sec. 18-58(d)(1) ). <br />The revised ordinance does provide an exception whereby develop- <br />ers/applicants may appeal to the Planning and Zoning Commission <br />if they desire to designate new roads with names instead of <br />numbers. Section 18-63 of the proposed ordinance (page 11) has <br />been revised to provide for road designation appeal procedures. <br />Such an appeal would occur concurrently with preliminary planned <br />residential development (PRD) or subdivision plat plan approval, <br />thus minimizing administrative delays. As per normal <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.