My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/15/1987
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1987
>
12/15/1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:59:21 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 1:57:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/15/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� _ r <br />7j,T1TE1OMTIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />Change order #11 increases the contract by $4,070 which results in a new <br />contract amount of $4,072,356.57. The work is necessary and staff has no <br />objection. <br />Dickerson Florida, Inc., has experienced numerous delays due to utility <br />relocations. The 26 day time extension is justified due to circumstances <br />beyond the control of the contractor. <br />prMMMETIDATION AND FUNDING <br />It is recatawnded that Change order #11 be approved and that a 26 day time <br />extension be granted to extend the contract time of ccopletion date to <br />February 7, 1987. <br />Funding to be from Fund 304, Indian River Boulevard South Construction <br />Account. <br />Chairman Scurlock questioned a change order to add drainage <br />that.should have been anticipated in the original engineering of <br />the road, and asked if there would be an additional cost. <br />Public Works Director Jim Davis felt the engineer probably <br />did not recognize a localized section of poor soil under the <br />roadway. He did not feel that a perforated pipe underdrain is <br />something that the engineer would have anticipated during design. <br />However, the inlet at the Vero Beach Mail probably should have <br />been caught at the time of design. <br />Chairman Scurlock pointed out that we have had some <br />significant problems on this particular project and that the <br />project has not gone very smoothly. <br />Commissioner Bird was concerned about the drainage and the <br />elevation of the Boulevard because we experienced some <br />significant drainage problems after a small hurricane that barely <br />came close to us. He wondered what drainage problems we would <br />encounter if a hurricane passed directly over us, especially in <br />the area of Fairiane Harbor. <br />Director Davis believed that drainage problem along that <br />area of the Boulevard really goes back to when the County allowed <br />'Vista Gardens to be built without carrying stormwater through <br />that large development. <br />It really isn't the fault of the design <br />7 BOOK 70 F'',GE •:�42 <br />C E C 151997 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.