1/19/1988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

JAN 19 1988 BOOK 70 rr,T 612 Orlando their non -conforming uses may expand through a condi- tional use review. Mr. Kirrie pointed out that with the present day problems of theft, vandalism, etc., those who live on the same land where they work, appreciate the reduction of these problems, and another factor is that insurance rates are lower for vehicles that are kept at the owner's residence. Mr. Kirrie thanked the Commission for their perseverance and urged their continuing diligence to complete this as they had originally envisioned so those living in ROSE -4 can continue to live as they have for many years without interference from those on the outside. Fred Mensing came before the Board to present graphs and material to back up Mr. Kirrie's presentation. He quoted the following from the Commission Minutes of February 24, 1987: " Attorney Vitunac understood that the intent of the Motion is to direct the County Attorney to find a vehicle for accomplishing making what is there legal, and to make the people who are legally grandfathered in a valid conforming use in the future. Commissioner Bowman asked for clarification of how we are planning to legalize the grandfathered businesses, and Attorney Vitunac explained that first a study would be• done to find out who is grandfathered under this new ordinance and then write a second ordinance, changing the. ROS.-9crIter.Ia,:Ifl. order to make them a valid and conforming use in.the future...._:: Chairman Scurlock.•felt..the.clear intent here has been expressed, and Commissioner Eggert emphasized that Ln seconding the Motion, her intent Is that this will be applied.:to only the ROSE -4 area. Mr. Mensing emphasized that the Board promised the people this would be done, and the County Attorney did not do this. Mr. Mensing then informed the Board that four or five people went to work over the weekend gathering signatures from owners in the ROSE -4 area exclusively. and he is submitting a petition signed by 167 property owners stating that they are satisfied with Ordinances 87-21 and 87-22 and request that the Board leave them 52