Laserfiche WebLink
Booz 70 rite 614 <br />`JAN 19 1988 <br />Mr. Mensing continued to review in detail the chart of the <br />area where the signatures were gathered, emphasizing its <br />accuracy, and stated that in Sec. 21, 85% of the land by acreage <br />and 77.7% by parcel want the ordinances to remain in place and in <br />Section 30, 87.8% of the land owners and 88% of the parcel <br />ownership want them to remain in place. He also has a letter <br />from Mr. Sembler, owners of 20 acres, who supports these <br />ordinances staying in place. <br />Mr. Mensing contended that the businesses in ROSE -4 make <br />less of an impact on the county and generate Tess traffic than if <br />this were subdivided to the maximum density allowed under the <br />Land Use Plan or 8 upa. They now cannot develop beyond 2 upa <br />because of the sewer restriction, which hopefully the county will <br />alleviate in the next few years. Mr. Mensing hoped this issue <br />can be laid to rest today with the Commission agreeing to leave <br />Ord. 87-22 in place so the people in ROSE -4 can retain their life <br />style. He felt the Board made a wise decision last February and <br />then got "snowed" by the Roseland Property Owners Association <br />which does not represent the people in that area. Mr. Mensing <br />continued to urge that the Board not repeal Ord. 87-22 but direct <br />competent members of staff to come up with polishing of Ord. <br />87-22 so present businesses there come into conformance as they <br />are, and identify them so there can't be any sneak expansion. <br />He would even suggest that the Board take the position that as of <br />today, they will accept no additional site plans and direct the <br />Tax Collector to accept no monies for licenses until the <br />suggested polishing of the ordinance is done. Mr. Mensing urged <br />the Board to be the intelligent people they are recognized to be <br />and let Ordinance 87-22 stand. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the wording on the petition <br />submitted by Mr. Mensing, i.e. - "We, the undersigned, are <br />residents and/or property owners in the ROSE -4 area and are <br />satisfied with Zoning Ordinances 87-21 & 87-22 and hereby <br />requesting that you leave them in place." <br />54 <br />