1/19/1988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

►AN 19 En BOOK 70 FACE 616 meetings on ROSE -4, was confused by the petition casts great doubt on its validity. He further pointed out that Mr. Mensing does not live in the ROSE -4 area, but just owns property there, and he did not see why the Roseland Property Owners should be limited to speaking only about the area where they live. Robert Kirrie, 12855 79th Ave., informed the Board that he was one of the persons who went around with the petition, and Mrs. Clark was given the opportunity to look at the ordinance as it was as was everyone else. Christopher Kirrie, 12855 79th Ave., advised that he also circulated the petition, and confirmed that if anyone was unsure of what they were signing, they had the opportunity to examine the ordinance as it was and he explained it to them as it existed today with home occupational uses and small business. He believed the majority were quite aware of the situation in the area and willingly signed the petition. Mr. Mensing stated that he is willing to swear that there is no way that petition was altered after anyone signed it. Mrs. Marshall wished to offer rebuttal Mr. Mensing's state- ment that traffic in the area does not present an impact. She noted that he and some very young boys were out this weekend with the petition and had a steady stream of traffic parading continually up and down 129th Street on his heavy equipment. Margaret Hearndon, 129th St., wished to rebut the statement made in regard to a discount on insurance for vehicles kept in the owner's yard. She stated that as long as those vehicles are kept in a fenced -in area, there is no penalty. She further noted that she was home on the weekend; no one brought her a petition to sign; and she wanted to say that she goes along with the committee with the work that they are doing. The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard. There were none, and he thereupon declared the public hearing closed. 56