Laserfiche WebLink
that they are just asking the Board to deny any rezoning at this <br />time and look at it again some time later. <br />Donald Line informed the Board that he owns property north <br />of parcel 10, the Busy Bee Nursery, which is commercial and <br />agricultural. He bought this quite some time ago just because it <br />was zoned commercial and -agricultural, and his home is on the <br />property facing Old Dixie. Mr. Line was against not only the <br />rezoning of parcels 10, 11 or 12, but was against any rezoning in <br />that area, which is all commercial. He felt it is a good setup <br />the way it is, and if it is rezoned, it will be a mish-mash and <br />would result in a devaluation of the property. Mr. Line informed <br />the Board that he is also speaking for Mr. Simmons, owner of a <br />little plot in this area. <br />Attorney B. T. Cooksey came before the Board representing C. <br />Reed Knight and Robert Bageley, owners of Parcels 8 and 9 located <br />in the southwest corner of the area proposed for rezoning. For <br />the purpose of the record, he advised that they would like to <br />object to the consideration of this request based on the fact <br />that the application for the rezoning does not meet the require- <br />ments of Sec. 27 of the County's Zoning Code. The grounds would <br />be the same as those put forth in the P&Z meeting held December <br />10, 1987. He did believe that staff is presently correcting that <br />problem. <br />Attorney Vitunac stated for the record that Asst. County <br />Attorney Collins has answered that contention to our satisfac- <br />tion. Mr. Cooksey does make a good point, however, and Mr. <br />Keating is working on changing the ordinance, but he was quite <br />comfortable that we can proceed legally today. <br />Attorney Cooksey continued that Mr. Knight and Mr. Bageley <br />feel the present zoning of 6 upa is a proper zoning. He pointed <br />out that the SAP is not a Comprehensive Plan but only a guide, <br />and, therefore, it is not mandated that it be followed. They <br />feel the SAP should be revisited as recommended by staff and by <br />the PBZ. Attorney Cooksey believed a review would show that the <br />27 <br />FE3 2 `966 <br />ROGF ` 0 € .A.756 <br />