My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/2/1988
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1988
>
2/2/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:33:44 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:04:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/02/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MOK <br />0=;[767 <br />The property was appraised by Armfield-Wagner Appraisal and <br />Research, Inc. of Vero Beach. The appraisal company (using a market <br />approach) stated the Market Value of the fee simple interest to the <br />property on October 13, 1987 was $150,000.00. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />The Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of <br />County Commissioners authorize the purchase of the 13.47 + Acre <br />parcel of land adjoining the Bent Pine utility site for the <br />afformentioned reasons. <br />Director Pinto informed the Board that after he had written <br />the above memo, the County Attorney informed him that there is a <br />new state law which requires advertisement for 30 days before the <br />action he is recommending can be taken. He can provide the <br />Board with maps, etc., but no action can be taken for 30 days <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Wheeler, to authorize advertisement of <br />the proposed purchase as required by law and bring <br />this matter back to the Board. <br />Commissioner Bowman wished to know if any thought has been <br />given to using an impoundment since it seems this area is being <br />proposed as an area for emergency use only. <br />Director Pinto explained that the actual use itself is only <br />for periods of time when you can't irrigate, but when you develop <br />an irrigation system, it is required that you provide an <br />alternative percolation site. The problem with going into <br />wetlands is that then you come under the Wetlands Act, and you <br />have to permit it entirely separately; you don't permit <br />irrigation of golf courses and impoundments together. The new <br />law kind of says it prohibits the use of any existing wetlands <br />for effluent disposal; however, you can create new artificial <br />wetlands. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.