Laserfiche WebLink
Pr - <br />FEB 21988 <br />BOOK 70 F' 'E 733 <br />Not valid until signed by both the Owner and Architect. <br />Signature of the Contractor indicates his agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. <br />The original (Contract Sum) AtAJ(a EKdra 4l6yt@ftXt1'rii?Ooii) was .$ 2,106,155 00 <br />Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ 424,560. 37 <br />7+Xi�r)Ed( <br />The (Contract Sum)(id(KIui�(�YiibYQrcYsl6Xprior to this Change Order was $ 2,530,715. 37 <br />The (Contract Sum) (GiXiE i140:0Xdb)iXA CXs j(will be (MiXA (decreased) (fir iii i = <br />by this Change Order • $ 64.03 <br />The new (Contract Sum) jetwrxt)Cml;j(444 (a(rj(i j$iQ including this Change Order will be $ 2,530,651.34 <br />The Contract Trine will be 4(1X'X)1K (d(t ( 0) (unchanged) by December 7, 1987 ( 0 ) Days. <br />The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is <br />Authprtzed: • <br />Chairman I.R.C. Commission <br />C.E. Block Architect, Inc. PWR Corporation <br />ARCHITECT <br />Address <br />BY <br />DATE <br />AIA DO MEM 6701 <br />CONTRACTOR <br />Address <br />BY (//7 <br />(p /1168 DATE //d <br />erg <br />OWNER <br />Address <br />BY <br />DATE <br />• CHANGE ORDER • APRIL 1975 EDITION ' • AIA• • <br />a <br />B. Change Order #3-10 Sheriff's Administration Building <br />The Board reviewed the following memo: <br />TO: <br />THRU: <br />COUNTY ADMINIS TOR <br />BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: JANUARY 19, 1988 <br />CHARLES P. BALCZUN <br />FROM: H. T. DEAN <br />OWNER'S A <br />ED REPRESENTATIVE <br />SUBJECT: SHERIFF'S ADMINISTRATION BUILDING <br />CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 3-10 <br />The subject Change Order is for the purpose of reimbursement of the <br />General Contractor's portion of monies generated in sales tax <br />savings as specified in Addendum Number 4 of the contract documents. <br />It should be noted that the County's share of this savings was <br />$25,875.43. <br />Staff recommends board approval and authorization for the Chairman <br />to execute the Change Order document. <br />Commissioner Bird felt it is fine that we were able to have <br />a savings in sales tax of $25,875.43, but hoped in the future we <br />could negotiate with the contractor and work out a way so that we <br />got the entire amount saved. <br />Chairman Scurlock pointed out that one of the problems is <br />that the contractor has to handle a lot of the paperwork, and <br />Commissioner Wheeler believed the actual cost of all the <br />accounting involved may add up to more than we save. <br />4 <br />