Laserfiche WebLink
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />Director Davis wished to update the Board on the status of <br />the Boulevard project. He informed the Board that he had a <br />meeting with the DER in the field, and they are in the process of <br />determining jurisdiction on the wetlands area. It_ has been <br />necessary for us to make the decision to proceed with the design <br />of a wetlands mitigation plan prior to owning the actual land <br />where the plan will be developed in order to move our permitting <br />along, and he wanted the Board to be aware that we are preparing <br />a mitigation plan on the property which is referred to as the <br />golf course impoundment - the 106 acres owned by the Caldwell and <br />Hoffman interests. <br />The Chairman wished to know if any action is needed from the <br />Board to move this along because if so, he wanted it brought <br />right to the Commission for action. <br />Director Davis noted that the big question people have been <br />raising is whether we have authority to condemn property for <br />mitigation purposes. He believed this has been tested in the <br />courts, which in some cases ruled we do not have that authority <br />and in other ,cases ruled that we do. <br />The Chairman and the County Attorney believed it has been <br />indicated we should move ahead with condemnation where required <br />on the assumption we have that power. <br />LANDCLEARING/TREE REMOVAL VIOLATION - KENNEDY GROVES <br />Staff Environmental Planner Roland DeBlois made the follow- <br />ing presentation: <br />33 <br />__F±E_B 1 6 i988 <br />BOOK 70 F �,, 851 <br />