Laserfiche WebLink
TO: Charles P. Balczun <br />County Administrator <br />DATE: March 24, 1988 <br />DIVISION HEADS CONCURRENCE: <br />Robert M. Keating, AICP IN K <br />Community Development DirecJBJECT: <br />James W. Davis, P.E. <br />Public Works Director <br />THROUGH: Gary Schindler <br />FR011iief, Long -Range Planning <br />Cheri J. Boudreaux <br />c <br />FILE: <br />FIVE-YEAR (FYS 1987- <br />1991) TRANSPORTATION <br />CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS <br />PROGRAM <br />REFERENCES: <br />Staff Planner, Long -Range Planning <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their <br />regular meeting of April 12, 1988. <br />DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS <br />The Planning and Public Works Departments have jointly prepared a <br />Five -Year Transportation Capital Improvements PEO -gram (TCIP) for <br />fiscal years 1987 through 1991. The proposed plan is a <br />short-term implementation of the County's 20 -Year Transportation <br />Capital Improvement Program. This 5 -Year plan is a revibisp to <br />the existing 2 -Year program (FYS 87-89) approved in February of <br />1987. <br />One objective of the proposed 5 -Year TCIP is to identify the <br />estimated costs and the anticipated revenues for transportation <br />capital improvements within the above mentioned five-year period. <br />Another objective of the proposed 5 -Year TCIP is to ensure that <br />traffic/roadway impact fees collected in individual benefit <br />districts are encumbered within six (6) to nine (9) years from <br />the date of receipt. This is to avoid the ordinance's <br />requirement which mandates the. return of all collected <br />unencumbered fees within the above stated time -frame. <br />The prioritizing of projects using justifiable criteria and <br />methodologies in order to allocate project funds is another <br />objective of the proposed 5 -Year TCIP. <br />On February 10, 1988, the Transportation Planning Committee <br />approved 7-0 the 5 -year TCIP. <br />ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS <br />In analyzing the estimated costs and the anticipated revenues for <br />the 5 -Year TCIP, projected local revenues were developed for <br />fiscal years 1987-1991 (see attachment #1). These projections <br />were based on actual County revenues collected in fiscal year <br />1986-87 and include traffic/roadway impact fees, local option gas <br />tax and state constitutional gas tax revenue. <br />According to these projections of anticipated local revenues and <br />estimated project costs, starting in fiscal year 1989-90, the <br />5 -Year TCIP indicates a total shortfall, of approximately four <br />and one-half (4z) million dollars. In order to balance costs and <br />revenues, the amount of revenue needs to be increased and/or <br />project expenditures reduced. <br />The proposed 5 -Year TCIP cash flow analysis estimates that <br />traffic/roadway impact fee revenue in all benefit districts, <br />except benefit district No. 3 in Sebastian, will be encumbered <br />through fiscal year 1991-92 (see attachment #2). <br />APR 121988 <br />45 BO 72 EASE 45 <br />