My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/27/1988
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1988
>
4/27/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:48:04 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:15:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/27/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairman Scurlock felt that to be consistent and fair, we <br />should consider all heavy trucking, such as citrus haulers and <br />cement trucks. <br />Director Davis noted that citrus trucks weigh about 62,000 <br />pounds when fully loaded. He also pointed out that mining <br />operations usually take place on roads that are not being used by <br />any other type of facility. However, he felt that some of the <br />language in the ordinance could be changed to say that the road <br />will be checked, and if it was found that extensive damage was <br />occurring within this radius, the requirement for a road damage <br />bond would kick in. There are certain mines in this county which <br />have had heavy impact on some roads, such as Lindsey Road. A <br />road is designed to carry an average of 18,000 axle loads, and <br />when you exceed that, you reduce the life of that road. <br />Director Keating felt that if the Board wants to take the <br />1/4 -mile radius out of the ordinance, we could probably take out <br />the compliance bond also. The Commission indicated that would be <br />acceptable to them. <br />Mr. Hall next questioned the requirements for restoration <br />bonds, and felt the Board could reduce the amounts, but the Board <br />indicated that they did not wish to change the restoration bond <br />requirements. <br />Charley Price, owner of a large mine next to the county line <br />on 1-95, had a problem with the size of the excavation area, <br />because although he owns a 40 -acre tract of land, he is only able <br />to get 11.9 acres of excavation. <br />Director Keating suggested changing the ordinance so that <br />the bond is required for the excavation area only, and specify <br />that the restoration bond will be $1,000 per acre of excavation. <br />Mr. Price then pointed out that although he does not own any <br />trucks, he would be subject to forfeiture of his compliance bond <br />for road damage. <br />After considerable discussion, Attorney Vitunac advised that <br />the ordinance could be changed to read "chargeable to the permit <br />7 <br />APR 2 " 1988 <br />Boor 72 <br />a ,� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.