Laserfiche WebLink
MAY 17 1988 <br />BOOK. , G 3Sp <br />wants to be legal and would abandon Phase III and content himself <br />with Phases 1 and 11, if he were just allowed to go on. <br />Commissioner Eggert asked how much he would have without <br />Phase 111, and Attorney O'Haire advised that Phase 1 is 3200 sq. <br />ft., which was the old Phase I and 11. <br />Chairman Scurlock felt that is what it should be, and <br />Commissioner Eggert agreed with that. <br />Attorney O'Haire concluded by stating that they have <br />addressed the 3 points that have remained unresolved. <br />Chairman Scurlock asked if anyone wished to present any <br />further information. <br />Mrs. Lena Marshall, resident of Roseland, stated that they <br />all agree that Mr. Kirrie's site plan and appeal is preposterous, <br />especially since Ordinance 87-22 has been repealed and he has <br />been grandfathered in. She felt we need to really look at the <br />situation up there now as a residential area and start trying to <br />do some code enforcement. As far as traffic is concerned, she <br />felt Attorney O'Haire has painted a rosy picture, but emphasized <br />that promises don't mean a thing once the paper work is done, <br />unless it is enforced. With all the trucks and heavy equipment, <br />she believed that at least 60 vehicles pass her house every day, <br />and they fear that the expansion would increase those numbers. <br />Mrs. Marshall felt the real issue before the Board today is the <br />appeal, not a modified expansion. The Roseland Property Owners <br />Association sees a promising future for the ROSE -4 District and <br />would like to go forward on other projects, such as setting up a <br />crime watch and getting a park in the middle of ROSE -4 District, <br />confident in the knowledge that they will not have the <br />manufacturing project of the magnitude being proposed right in <br />the middle of an upcoming residential neighborhood. <br />Commissioner Eggert asked for clarification on which <br />ordinance Mr. Kirrie presented his application for expansion, and <br />Attorney Vitunac advised that Mr. Kirrie applied under Ordinance <br />87-22, which was repealed before he had received any <br />39 <br />