My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/28/1988
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1988
>
6/28/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:00:10 PM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:21:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/28/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
"- LOS standards should apply only to the roadway directly <br />serving the project. The ordinance amendment includes <br />definitions for insignificant project, significant projects, <br />and directly accessed roadway, was well as a provision <br />limiting the application of LOS standards for small projects <br />to those major roadways directly serving the project. <br />Minimum lane width - Currently, there is a conflict between <br />the parking regulations and site plan regulations regarding <br />minimum one-way driveway widths. While the parking ordinance <br />establishes an 11' minimum width, the site plan ordinance <br />specifies a 12' minimum width. <br />Through application of the present ordinance, staff has found <br />that eleven foot driving lanes can adequately accommodate one <br />way drives. Therefore, the amendment proposes a reduction of <br />the minimum width of one way drives from twelve to eleven <br />feet, bringing the site plan and parking regulations into <br />consistency. <br />Marginal Access - Staff has revised the marginal access <br />requirements to clarify the section. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />The staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt <br />the recommended ordinance amendment. <br />Robert Keating, Director of Planning & Development, reviewed <br />the following proposed amendments: <br />INTERSECTIONS <br />... Defines major intersections <br />... Differentiates LOS (Level of Service ) Analysis by <br />intersection type <br />-- Signalized intersection: CMA <br />-- Unsignalized intersection: warrant criteria <br />LOS STANDARDS <br />...Clarifies that peak season standard relates to peak <br />hour/peak season <br />... Identifies limits of LOS analysis for small (insignificant) <br />projects <br />... Limits insignificant project LOS analysis to directly <br />accessed links <br />... Clarifies traffic impact analysis submittal timeframes <br />MARGINAL ACCESS ROADS <br />... Clarifies marginal .access road requirements <br />... Provides discretion to Public Works Director to waive access <br />road requirements under certain conditions <br />LANE.WIDTH <br />... Reduces one-way lane width from 12 feet to 11 feet <br />JUN�9 � 2 8 8001. 73 ur,L 1? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.