7/26/1988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Commissioner Wheeler asked if we will end up with the R/W eventually or not, and Planner Boling explained that the original proposed site plan set back everything 20' from the existing R/W line. What they are proposing now is just to remove any indica- tion that there is a 10' strip to be dedicated to the county. As it stands now with the modification, they would not be encroach- ing into any future R/W at this time. Commissioner Wheeler noted that if we suspend the applica- tion, they could come back in and change the site plan and move the building over; then we will be back here again. Planner Boling advised that they are not changing the design of the site plan - all that they are asking for right now is the deleting of the reference to that strip, within which strip they showed a bike path. If we do suspend application of the R/W requirements, then they could come back in later on and redesign the parking lot and move it closer to A -1-A. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird for purposes of discussion, to approve the staff recommendation. Chairman Scurlock felt that the Attorney's office has done a real fine job, as well as the Planning Department. He believed Attorney Bill Collins came up with about 7 cases that are directly on point on this issue, and it was determined that it is an evolving situation and there is no direct answer at this point. The Chairman noted that it is easy from the Planning staff's point of view to say we have to have the roads and we have to have the money - so, let's be aggressive and accomplish that, but the other side of the picture is that developers are trying to get their projects built in a feasible way and all these factors must be balanced. The bottom line is that at some point that infrastructure is going to have to be built and it will come to the point that if you don't have a vehicle to JUL 199 1 s mow 73 r E 262