Laserfiche WebLink
M <br />2. ALTEE2NATIVES AND ANALYSIS: <br />The one bid received was incanplet:e. Staff recatmends that <br />this project be rebid. To encourage additional cmnpet:ition <br />the specifications should be modified to allow more cmipetition. <br />3. PECONINII OmoNs: <br />Rebid IRC BID #455 with specification changes as determined necessary <br />by Staff. <br />4. ATBCHMERrS: <br />Metro frau Sonny Dean. <br />5. DISTRIBUTIONS: <br />Terry Pinto P.E. <br />Sonny Dean <br />6. APPROVED AGEmDA ITEM: <br />FOR 7- <br />BY = <br />CzUS - T t"ON F S 14 NEb nw5 't"Atr <br />'N**'1'WCRj NOW aWAXV HAT <br />1. W%Y gob IAA3 i#lt6uPw% <br />z , tie US �&Pvzz 31*4" a¢ MObIfte0o <br />Q'LOWe &V.AaARO 14f p aat. p, . <br />/ia 1* <br />Administrator Balczun explained that the prime difficulty <br />with the pathogenic incinerator was that the vendor did not bid <br />the complete equipment; primarily, his bid dealt with the <br />installation. Either he didn't send it all in or he misunder- <br />stood. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if all this was bid together or if <br />the buildings were bid separately, and Utilities Director Pinto <br />advised that there is one building which is the garage with the <br />offices in it and the pathogenic building with the incinerator, <br />and they were bid together. <br />Commissioner Bird noted that we apparently sent out 52 <br />invitations to bid but only received one bid, and he wondered if <br />we need to review our procedures or bidding requirements on these <br />smaller buildings as possibly our requirements for bonds, <br />insurance, etc., are so cumbersome that people don't bid. <br />Director Pinto agreed that is a problem. The insurance <br />requirements, for instance, are one reason the contractors would <br />' <br />JUS 2 6 1988BOOK 73 r-,�r,F 09&53 <br />