Laserfiche WebLink
TO:rhe Honorable Members of the DATE:August 15, 1988 FILE: <br />Board of County Commissioners <br />DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />SUBJECT; REQUEST TO AMEND SECTIONS <br />Robert M. Kea ng, P 3 (A) . 1 (e) (3) f AND <br />Community Deve opm Director 25.1 (a) (3) REGARDING <br />BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS <br />BETWEEN AGRICULTURAL USES <br />AND NON-AGRICULTURAL USES: <br />FROM: Stan Boling, AICP ✓� REFERENCES: buffering <br />Chief, Current Development IBMIRD <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular <br />meeting of August 23, 1988. <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: <br />Current County regulations (adopted in 1985) require developers of <br />newly created lots, where such lots abut an active agricultural <br />operation, to provide a buffer from the agricultural property. <br />The buffer can either be a 50' setback or a 25' "...heavily <br />landscaped"... bufferyard. The intent of the regulations is to <br />protect residents in newly developed subdivisions from possible <br />harmful effects of accidental drift of aerially sprayed chemicals. <br />Until recently, no proposed subdivision had ever warranted appli- <br />cation of these buffer requirements. However, the current regu- <br />lations do apply to the proposed Copeland's Landing subdivision <br />(adjacent to a small, active grove) which was recently considered <br />and conditionally approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission <br />at its April 28, 1988 regular meeting. <br />At the April 28, 1988 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission <br />discussed the need to have the zoning code..clarified in regards to <br />bufferyard requirements on newly created lots situated adjacent to <br />active agricultural operations .(section 3(A).1(e)(3)f). Subse- <br />quently, staff obtained authorization from. the Board of County <br />Commissioners to initiate zoning code amendments to clarify the <br />existing regulations. This report addresses the issue of agricul- <br />tural spraying and identifies amendments now proposed by staff <br />(see attachment #2) to specify new buffering requirements. <br />. Planning & Zoning Commission Action <br />At its regular meeting of July 28, 1988, the Planning and Zoning <br />:Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the Board of County <br />Commissioners adopt the proposed ordinance amendment with some <br />bufferyard changes. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommen- <br />dation is explained in detail at the end of this report, under <br />"Bufferyard Alternatives". <br />ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS: <br />Characteristics of Aerial and Ground Spraying <br />Active agricultural operations in the county, especially citrus <br />groves, use aerial and/or ground spraying to apply pesticides and <br />certain chemical or mineral nutrients to plants (fertilizing is <br />usually done by means of broadcast spreading along the ground). <br />Aerial spraying involves the use of airplanes flying as close to <br />tree level as possible in repeated "runs" over a cultivated area. <br />Ground spraying involves the use of trucks, mounted with direc- <br />tional fans (jets), that spray liquid pesticides and other chemi- <br />cals into the air in several directions: over, into, and under- <br />neath trees. The trucks move through the cultivated area in <br />between plant rows. Spraying (aerial or ground) usually occurs <br />71 <br />UG 2 3 1988 Boa 73 <br />