My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/4/1988
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1988
>
10/4/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:22:26 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:27:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/04/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Abernethy confirmed that it had but the items were too small for <br />that area. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commis- <br />sioner Eggert, the Board unanimously (4-0) declared <br />the above listed items surplus and directed that the <br />funds from. their sale be deposited in the proper <br />account in the Utility Department. <br />OUTSTANDING AND OVERDUE PAVING AND DRAINAGE ASSESSMENTS <br />Attorney Vitunac reviewed the following memo: <br />TO: Board of County Commissioners <br />FROM: Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney <br />DATE: September 26, 1988 <br />RE: OUTSTANDING AND OVERDUE PAVING AND <br />DRAINAGE ASSESSMENTS --Board Meeting 10/4/88 <br />At the beginning of this year this office began working with <br />the Tax Collector to solve the problem of approximately 60 <br />delinquent paving and drainage assessment liens. Now <br />arrangements have been made to make either a monthly payment <br />or to pay the lien in full on all but one of the outstanding <br />assessments. <br />Regarding payment of the only remaining outstanding <br />assessment (Bergamo), the homeowner and the Tax Collector <br />have been negotiating on making arrangements for monthly <br />payments. However, the problem is that the Bergamos say <br />they can only pay $20 per month (which would take. <br />approximately seven years to satisfy the lien), and the Tax <br />Collector's Office feels the minimum they could accept on <br />behalf of the County would be $50 per month (which would <br />satisfy the lien in 21 years). The only other alternative <br />to get the lien satisfied would be for this office to <br />proceed with foreclosure against the property. <br />Since this is a Board approved paving and drainage project <br />and the money is owed to the Board of County Commissioners, <br />the Tax Collector feels the Board should make the decision <br />of whether to permit the homeowner to make the lower payment <br />or to file the foreclosure. Therefore, we are requesting <br />direction on how to proceed. <br />OCT 41988 <br />46 <br />F ,E 443 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.