Laserfiche WebLink
STATUS REPORT ON THE 911 SURCHARGE <br />Acting Administrator Collins explained that this is just a <br />status report, and there is no written backup. It has to do with <br />the surcharge on the telephone to support the 911 system. <br />Director Wright reminded the Board that the maximum surtax <br />of 504, which is divided to cover recurring and non-recurring <br />expenses for operation of our 911 system, was a 36/14 split <br />during this year. As of this October, however, the 144 will <br />expire, and we now have recalculated figures based on our <br />population in terms of number of lines and taking into consid- <br />eration the figures on our carry over, and it looks like it will <br />be a 40/10 split for next year. The 104 is for non-recurring <br />costs; our operating costs are still intact; and he just wanted <br />the Board to be aware there may be about a two week delay in <br />:starting up the 104 cost. We will need a Resolution to impose <br />that, and he wi_II be bringing that back to the Board on November <br />1st. <br />Commissioner Eggert believed that 911 is part of what is <br />funding Central Dispatch. We shifted some funds over at <br />budgettime, and she felt that we need to investigate all the <br />money that goes into the funding and get a true cost of Central <br />Dispatch, how it impacts everyone and who needs to provide funds <br />for it. <br />FINAL ASSESSMENT (ERCILDOUNE HGHTS SUB. NORTH HALF & SOUTH HALF) <br />The Board reviewed memo from Civil Engineer Terry: <br />33 <br />OCT 18 '98 <br />BOOK .74 F',1 JE. 553 <br />