Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK 75 FgE J1fl <br />ASSESSMENT FOR ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE (PLUMMER STRICKLAND) <br />The Board reviewed memo from Code Enforcement Officer Heath: <br />TO: William G. Collins, II <br />Acting County Administrator <br />THROUGH: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />"4'0' <br />Robert M. Keats g, <br />Community Developmei"Director <br />Roland M. DeBlois �0 <br />Chief, Environmental /P/lanning <br />Charles W. Heathe,�,d. /n <br />Code Enforcement Officer <br />November 1, 1988 <br />SUBJECT: PLUMMER STRICKLAND, PUBLIC NUISANCE; <br />ASSESSMENT FOR ABATEMENT OF NUISANCE <br />It is requested that the data herein be given formal consid- <br />eration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular <br />meeting of December 6, 1988. <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: <br />On May 27, 1988, code enforcement staff sent a Notice of Public <br />Nuisance to Plummer Strickland, concerning the hazardous, dilap- <br />idated mobile home, garbage, junk, trash and debris. The respon- <br />dent was cited as maintaining his property in violation of <br />Section 13-18(b)(1), Public Nuisance, of the Code of Laws and <br />Ordinances, which prohibits the accumulation of unserviceable <br />vehicles, vehicle parts, garbage, junk, trash and debris. <br />The certified letter of notice was returned as undeliverable. <br />The code enforcement staff then posted notice on the subject <br />property, as set forth in Section 13-23 of the County Code, <br />giving the respondent thirty (30) days to remedy the violation. <br />The violation was not abated within the prescribed thirty (30) <br />day time period. Therefore, in accordance with Section 13-19(b) <br />of the Public Nuisance Ordinance, .County personnel (ie: Road & <br />Bridge Division) abated the nuisance violation, with costs to be <br />assessed against the subject property. <br />Section 13-21 of the Public Nuisance Ordinance requires that the <br />cost of the nuisance abatement shall be calculated and reported <br />to the Board of County Commissioners, who, by resolution, shall <br />assess such costs against the subject property. This matter is <br />presented herein to the Board for consideration to adopt said <br />resolution. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS: <br />Section 13-21(a), Public Nuisances, of the Code of Laws and <br />Ordinances of Indian River County specifically reads as follows: <br />"After abatement of nuisance by the county, the cost <br />thereof to the county as to each lot, parcel or tract <br />60 <br />