Laserfiche WebLink
roads to vest in the County, the roads must be maintained <br />for a period of four years. The property owners have title <br />to the centerline of the old highway. The Judge accepted <br />the fact that we were maintaining the paved road and two <br />feet of shoulder, but since title to the property vested in <br />the owners and our maintenance map was not filed for the <br />statutory period, he rejected our claim of title to an <br />additional grassed area. The only argument buttressing our <br />position that we maintained these parcels is the fact that <br />there are some drainage swales and utility poles in the <br />grassed area and some testimony from our Road and Bridge <br />Department that we mowed the grass and cleaned ditches. <br />However, we don't have any official records of maintenance <br />and, our chances of succeeding in any suit on these parcels <br />are slim. <br />On Parcel No. 162 owned by Richard and Arlyne Zorc, on the <br />southeast corner of 12th Street and Old Dixie, a different <br />situation exists. In this case, the County owned a 25 -foot <br />recorded right-of-way from the centerline of the road. <br />However, the road was roll -curbed some distance into the <br />right-of-way and the Zorcs were utilizing the property <br />between the curb and their building for approximately eight <br />parking spaces. There is a legal issue as to how many <br />"legal" parking spaces the Zorcs lost by virtue of our <br />taking and we might have some chance to prevail on this <br />issue, but in view of the fact that the Judge appears to <br />have accepted the "cost to cure" approach rather than the <br />severance damage approach, and in view of the fact that the <br />cost estimates to cure appear reasonable, it would be in the <br />County's best financial interest to settle this parcel <br />rather than to incur substantial additional expenses in an <br />attempt to advance an arguable position. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />1. Settle Parcel No. 130 for the amount already paid, plus <br />an attorney's fee, appraisal fee, and expenses, all <br />totalling $3,500.00. <br />2. Settle Parcel Nos. 139 and 140 for the amount already. <br />paid into the Court, plus an additional payment of $978.30 <br />for concrete curb work to provide driveway access, plus an <br />appraisal fee in the amount of $440.00. Do not settle as to <br />the attorney's fee requested ($2,500.00). - <br />3. Settle Parcel No. 141 for the amount already paid into <br />the Court, plus an attorney's fee in the amount of <br />$3,500.00. <br />4. Settle Parcel No. 162 by paying an additional $13,335.30 <br />representing the cost to cure the loss of parking spaces. <br />Do not settle for the attorney's fee requested ($9,500.00). <br />5. Settle Parcel No. 163 for the amount paid into the Court <br />already, plus an appraisal fee of $440.00, and an attorney's <br />fee of $150.00. <br />6. Go to Court on the issue of attorney's fees only for the <br />Richard and Arlyne Zorc Parcel Nos. 139, 140, and 162. Mr. <br />O'Haire has submitted time records on these parcels which <br />total to $6,713.80. He has requested attorney's fees on <br />these parcels in the amount of $12,000.00. Without further <br />justification of these fees, it is worth going to a hearing <br />on fees. <br />JAN 10 19E9 <br />49 <br />DOOK <br />