My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/17/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
1/17/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:17:31 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:40:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/17/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JAN 17 1989 <br />BOOK 75 f'NCE 644 <br />3. U.S. #1 traffic problem at Mr. Miller's lounge. <br />The Committee was informed that the D.O.T. was <br />performing a traffic study at this location which will <br />be complete in late February, 1989. <br />4. Petition paving of 134th St. in Roseland. <br />The Committee recommended this project be brought <br />before a public hearing as soon as possible. <br />Commissioner Bowman explained that Item #2 was requested by <br />the U.S. Post Office. The TPC recommends approval of the repair <br />which is estimated at $200. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously approved <br />the $200 repair to the pedestrian bridge spanning the <br />20th Ave. canal at 18th St., as recommended by the TPC. <br />Commissioner Scurlock wanted to discuss Item #1 regarding the <br />closing of 16th Street between Indian River Boulevard and Third <br />Avenue, because he was getting a little tired of this particular <br />issue. He stressed that the residents of Rockridge are valued <br />residents of the county, but by virtue of being nestled in <br />adjacent to the city limits of Vero Beach, they end up being a <br />stepchild in many issues by not having a proper vehicle to be <br />heard by the City Council. In fact, at a recent speaking <br />engagement he attended, a member of the City Council looked at him <br />and said that he didn't have any problem in keeping the road open <br />if the County would go ahead and bring that road up to County <br />standards -- otherwise, the heck with it. The fact of the matter <br />is that road has been there for 30 years with the full knowledge <br />of the City of Vero Beach, and it has never been up to any <br />standards, city or county. This bit of indicating that the County <br />was somehow the cause of this is a bunch of nonsense. The fact <br />44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.