Laserfiche WebLink
'JAN " z 089 <br />EOOK % F+SCE 687 <br />Mrs. Bunnell understood then that the application would be <br />filed for the part of the road that the County owns, because that <br />is how the application is worded. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The amended <br />Motion was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner, the Board unanimously authorized the <br />County Administrator and the Public Works Director to <br />file a maintenance map on the portion of Jungle Trail <br />north of CR -510. <br />Commissioner Bowman felt we need to try again to convince <br />the various state and federal agencies to permit a "no wake" area <br />along the intercoastal. In addition, she felt it was a mistake <br />for us to allow developers to pay funds in lieu of giving beach <br />access. <br />Attorney Vitunac advised that the Planning and Legal <br />Departments are discussing the inconsistencies in requiring <br />owners of property on the ocean or the river to either provide <br />access or pay funds in lieu of providing beach access. We are <br />considering something like a beach access impact fee where every <br />unit of new development would pay into a fund which the County <br />would use to buy river and beach access. Right now the County <br />charges only the beach and riverfront developers, but people <br />living only one block off the ocean or river don't pay a cent <br />towards beach or river access. <br />Commissioner Bowman asked where we would buy this access, <br />but Commissioner Scurlock felt the question is that we need to <br />redefine our ordinance in such a way that if an impact fee is <br />charged, it should impact everyone, not just a select few. <br />Attorney Vitunac stated that if we are serious about beach <br />access, he would not mind preempting the entire Judge's ruling on <br />39 <br />