My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/24/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
1/24/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:19:18 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:42:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/24/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NEGOTIATIONS FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES - KINGS HIGHWAY <br />IMPROVEMENTS <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1116/89: <br />TO: James E. Chandler, <br />County Administrator <br />THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. <br />Publicic Works <br />Direkt"co <br />FROM: James D. White, P.E. <br />Capital Project Manage <br />SUBJECT: Negotiations for Engineering Services <br />Project Announcement No. 461 <br />Kings Highway Improvements and <br />Various Assessment Paving Projects <br />DATE: January 16, 1989 <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />Staff has attempted to negotiate terms of an agreement for <br />services for the following projects with Kimley-Horn and <br />Associates: <br />Part 1 Special Assessment Paving <br />a) Walker Avenue(26th Street) from 66th Avenue west to <br />Village Green Phase II - approximately 0.50 miles <br />b) Cherry Lane (33rd Street) from 58th Avenue to 66th <br />Avenue - approximately 1.0 miles <br />c) R.D. Carter Road (1st Street SW from Kings Highway <br />(58th Avenue) to Monroe Road (66th Avenue) <br />approximately 1.0 miles. <br />Part 2 <br />a) Improve, signalize and upgrade intersection of CR510 at <br />A -1-A. <br />b) Widen from two lanes to five lanes Kings Highway from <br />SR60 south to 12th Street, approximately 1.0 miles <br />Staff has been unable through negotiations to agree to a fee <br />considered acceptable for the services. A copy of the last fee <br />proposal is attached. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />The alternatives are as follows: <br />Alternative No. 1 <br />Break off negotiations with Kimley Horn and initiate negotiations <br />with the second ranked firm (Gee & Jensen of Stuart) and/or the <br />third ranked firm (Marshall McCully & Associates of Vero Beach) <br />in an attempt to negotiate a more acceptable fee. <br />Alternative No. 2 <br />Break off negotiations with Kimley Horn and re -advertise the <br />selection and generate a new short list to work from. <br />Alternative No. 3 <br />Accept the fees proposed by Kimley Horn and draft an agreement <br />accordingly. <br />56 <br />JAN 2 41589 <br />BOCK. . F.fi E 704 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.