Laserfiche WebLink
Ir" <br />FEB d 1939 <br />BOOK <br />76FE66 <br />Board members generally favored reviewing the financial <br />records every two years, or twice during the 5 year period. <br />COMMISSIONER EGGERT SECONDED Commissioner Scurlock's <br />Motion for staff to redraft the agreement as discussed <br />and bring it back to the Board. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />Richard Schuler, Whippoorwill Lane, wished to comment. He <br />complimented each Board member on what they have accomplished for <br />the county in their particular area, but wished to know with all <br />that in the background, what respect we are giving the folks who <br />originally gave that park land to the county. The County <br />accepted their terms; those terms were passed on to the state; <br />and now the Commission is going to break that trust. He felt if <br />push comes to shove, the Board could ask if the state can get the <br />permission of the people who originally gave the land. <br />Commissioner Scurlock pointed out that first of all, we <br />haven't given anything to the state. We are only indicating that <br />we will waive a deed restriction for a certain period of time to <br />see their good faith effort. <br />Mr. Schuler stated that he would like to have on record the <br />County Attorney's professional word that the Board has the legal <br />right to transfer the deeds the way in which they were received <br />and guaranty there would be no future suits or class action he <br />could not defend. <br />Commissioner Scurlock did not believe Mr. Schuler understood <br />the Motion. He explained that we are not transferring any deeds; <br />we are simply giving them the ability to charge an entrance fee <br />for a period of 5 years; we are not giving away the land. <br />Attorney Collins informed Mr. Schuler that when the DNR <br />first brought up this proposal, we had a title search done. If, <br />66 <br />