My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/21/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
2/21/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:39:58 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:41:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/21/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The issue is did Sea Oaks come in and satisfy all the require- <br />ments of the ordinances, and they did. He agreed the county has <br />an ordinance that says essentially that rules will be adopted to <br />permit the establishment of planting strips, and that is fine. <br />That is what the Management Plan is doing, and when Mr. McQueen <br />comes in and makes his presentation to the committee, there will <br />be discussion and give and take, and eventually you will come up <br />with a standard and guidelines for everyone, but the county <br />doesn't have that yet. All the county has now is an ordinance <br />that says they are going to adopt some rules, and the county has <br />had that ordinance since 1985. Sea Oaks has submitted a site <br />plan which everyone agrees is satisfactory; then as an additional <br />consideration, staff wanted a landscape plan of what will be done <br />in the buffer zone, and one has been presented by Sea Oaks. <br />Attorney Barkett displayed the plan, advising that it <br />includes $150,000 of plants, all native vegetation and it does <br />not violate any existing standard or ordinance. Staff took the <br />position that the plan did not satisfy the ordinance and they <br />then proposed a 10' opaque hedge along the edge of the road and <br />said that was what the rule should be. Attorney Barkett <br />emphasized that is not in the ordinance anywhere, and no other <br />applicant has ever been required to submit to such a condition. <br />Attorney Collins pointed out that the Resolution gives Sea <br />Oaks the option to comply with the Management Plan instead of <br />this condition. <br />Attorney Barkett agreed -that they could either comply with <br />an illegal requirement or wait and see what comes out of the <br />Management Plan, but he likened that to having a gun held to your <br />head by a highway robber. He pointed out that the P&Z decided to <br />pass this problem on to the Commission. They acknowledged the <br />rules are not in place yet, and Mr. Tippin & Mr. Brenner agreed <br />that they could not hold to standards that have not yet been <br />promulgated. <br />FEB 215189 <br />39 <br />BOOK lb F 1Jr <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.