3/21/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Petition Paving project. This is a funding source that was recommended by the dvisory Committee of the Vero Lake Estates Property Owners Association. In discussion, it was noted that Association does not represent everyone in the area, but Director Davis advised that there were about 40 people at the last meeting he attended. Commissioner =ird wished to know if the taxes that come into that MSTU are mainly for drainage. Director Davis stated that basically to date they have been working on a drainage study. They have not spent $100,000. The first draft of the communicating with of the other entiti The drainage work t associated with thil. drainage as we do a Commissioner B is one of the main study is now complete and they are the Sebastian River Drainage District and some es that have control over the watershed area. hey have done out there primarily has been s paving project; we are incorporating the n improvement. ird asked if the Advisory Committee feels this thoroughfares out there and that paving it will give people better access to more homesites. Discussion ens section is one of t long; and it is bei assessments, as wel ued, and Director Davis confirmed that this he main thoroughfares; it is about 11 miles ng paid for by the MSTU plus the front footage 1 as about $10,000 from impact fees. Commissioner Bowman commented that the MSTU previously assessed themselves $15 per parcel/acre for road and drainage improvements, and Mr. McBride stated that he was under the impression it was for drainage only. He was informed that was not the case. In further discussion, it was noted that the original pro- posal was aimed at paving roads, and then it was decided that drainage for the whole area was a significant problem also. Commissioner Bird pointed out that, if Mr. McBride's objec- tion is to paving the road, as more and more people move out there, it is very probably only a matter of time until most of 23 MAR 21 1989 euUK ib Fair 41b