4/18/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOOK 76 FACE 621 APR 181989 of development - the parking lot and the footpath and areas west of Jungle Trail. Because Sea Oaks contemplated putting in a fence, staff demanded a separate site plan and administrative approval for the area east of Jungle Trail, and that plan was approved last July. That landscaping has been implemented already. Sea Oaks then came back in regard to the ordinance allowing public/private docks as special exception uses in RM -6 and they were required to have a pump -out facility and because of that, they had to alter the parking somewhat. However, nothing south of the footpath and east of Jungle Trail, which is the subject of this site plan, has been altered or amended. Their position is,. and Assistant County Attorney Collins, agrees, that this is an approved, implemented and installed landscape plan and Sea Oaks has a vested position. Staff does not want the parking lot to be visible from Jungle Trail, and Sea Oaks has agreed to ar beef up the vegetation along the parking lot in the site plan they are proposing to accomplish that purpose, but not to put it back off this site where they already have approved landscaping. Commissioner Scurlock inquired about the cost that might be associated with condition 2(b), and Attorney Barkett did not know. He pointed out that in regard to meeting what was required of River Villas, that was a separate landscape plan; it just required filling in some vegetation and they have not associated a cost. Commissioner Bird asked if just putting additional vegeta- tion along the parking area would not accomplish the screening, and Planner Boling agreed it would. The only area of contention really is south of the parking area. Attorney Barkett questioned the legality of readdressing an already implemented landscape plan, and Commissioner Bird agreed and did not feel the money is even a factor to be considered. 'Commissioner Eggert believed that former County Attorney 32